|
|
Post by St. Louis Sting on Aug 18, 2017 15:59:44 GMT -5
Quick question here, does everyone prefer one week per playoff matchup or two weeks? For the sake of fairness I usually prefer two weeks, but because we have byes for the top teams that is a long time where those teams don't get to play anyone. Either way is fine, but I wanted to see where the league stood on this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clayhounds Dawgs on Aug 18, 2017 17:02:05 GMT -5
I like 1 week match up because that the way the season is played out, weekly. I sure this will work against me when playoff time comes. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Montana Grizzlies on Aug 18, 2017 19:46:13 GMT -5
I am a one week kinda guy... I like the Dawgs' rational there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jon (Huskies) on Aug 18, 2017 21:47:18 GMT -5
I like one week better personally as well
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff (Haze) on Aug 18, 2017 21:52:15 GMT -5
I like the idea of 2 week playoffs, but it doesn't fit well into a 16 game season
|
|
|
|
Post by St. Louis Sting on Aug 18, 2017 21:55:37 GMT -5
I agree on NFL. This was more geared to NHL, NBA, and MLB where there are longer seasons. I wasn't planning on having 2 week matchups in NFL no matter what
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff (Haze) on Aug 18, 2017 22:41:59 GMT -5
oh ok. Got football on the brain
|
|
|
|
Post by Bill (Ragin' Cajuns) on Aug 19, 2017 21:47:21 GMT -5
One week
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff (Haze) on Aug 24, 2017 17:38:55 GMT -5
Not so much for MLB or NFL because baseball teams play almost every day and outside of BYE weeks, football teams all play once a week.
NHL and NBA schedules aren't quite as symmetrical so I think they should stay 2 weeks. If it were single season redraft streaming can be effective, but the contract structure of our league isn't conducive to that strategy.
|
|
